FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A

Full Board Details for Round 2

FREQUENCY CHART FOR BOARDS 1 TO 8

Round 2

Bd	Score	No		Score	No		Score	No		Score	No		Score	No		Score	No		Score	No
1	-150	1		-120	1		-110	1		-100	1		50	3		110	1		140	1
2	-140	2		50	3		100	4
3	-650	1		-620	3		-200	1		100	2		450	2
4	680	6		710	1		1430	2
5	-100	1		600	4		630	3		660	1
6	-300	1		-150	3		-100	2		-50	2		400	1
7	100	1		110	4		120	2		130	2
8	50	1		100	3		110	2		130	1		140	1		150	1

1 ANDREW HILL & DAVID SHILLING

Round 2

vs 15 CHRIS BARNWELL & MERILYN PARIS

EW 4		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	3 E-1	A	-50	38%	5 EW	3NTS=	6	-600	69%
2 EW	4 E-1	2	-50	63%	6 EW	4 xN-2	8	300	100%
3 EW	5 W=	10	650	100%	7 EW	1NTS+1	3	-120	32%
4 EW	6 N=	3	-1430	7%	8 EW	2 N=	9	-110	44%
Percentage 56.25%

______________________________________________________________________

2 CAROLE & JOHN FOREMAN

Round 2

vs 4 INGRID COOKE & ANNE HARRIS

EW 1		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	2 S=	Q	-110	13%	5 EW	3NTS=	Q	-600	69%
2 EW	4 E-1	4	-50	63%	6 EW	3NTS=	5	-400	0%
3 EW	5 S=	K	-450	7%	7 EW	1 S+2	2	-110	69%
4 EW	4 S+2	A	-680	69%	8 EW	2 N+1	9	-140	13%
Percentage 37.50%

______________________________________________________________________

3 SHARMINI ANDERSON & ANN CLARKE

Round 2

vs 5 JOANNE BAKAS & BILL BRADSHAW

EW 2		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	3 E=	A	110	75%	5 EW	3NTS+1	5	-630	25%
2 EW	4 E-1	4	-50	63%	6 EW	3NTS-3	K	150	75%
3 EW	5 W-1	10	-100	32%	7 EW	1 S+1	3	-110	69%
4 EW	4 S+2	A	-680	32%	8 EW	3 E-2	J	-100	75%
Percentage 55.47%

______________________________________________________________________

4 INGRID COOKE & ANNE HARRIS

Round 2

vs 2 CAROLE & JOHN FOREMAN

NS 1		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	2 S=	Q	110	88%	5 NS	3NTS=	Q	600	32%
2 NS	4 E-1	4	50	38%	6 NS	3NTS=	5	400	100%
3 NS	5 S=	K	450	94%	7 NS	1 S+2	2	110	32%
4 NS	4 S+2	A	680	32%	8 NS	2 N+1	9	140	88%
Percentage 62.50%

______________________________________________________________________

5 JOANNE BAKAS & BILL BRADSHAW

Round 2

vs 3 SHARMINI ANDERSON & ANN CLARKE

NS 2		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	3 E=	A	-110	25%	5 NS	3NTS+1	5	630	75%
2 NS	4 E-1	4	50	38%	6 NS	3NTS-3	K	-150	25%
3 NS	5 W-1	10	100	69%	7 NS	1 S+1	3	110	32%
4 NS	4 S+2	A	680	69%	8 NS	3 E-2	J	100	25%
Percentage 44.53%

______________________________________________________________________

6 MARC DEATON & ALICIA TERRY

Round 2

vs 16 SALLY FRASER & HELEN GRAY

NS 3		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	3NTW-1	6	50	63%	5 NS	3 N-1	A	-100	0%
2 NS	3 E-2	4	100	82%	6 NS	3NTS-2	5	-100	57%
3 NS	5 E-1	10	100	69%	7 NS	1 S+3	3	130	94%
4 NS	6 S=	A	1430	94%	8 NS	2 W-2	A	100	25%
Percentage 60.16%

______________________________________________________________________

7 ANNE DAVEY & ALICE HANDLEY

Round 2

vs 10 HELEN KITE & HELEN ROLLOND

EW 6		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	3NTW-1	4	-50	38%	5 EW	3NTS=	5	-600	69%
2 EW	4 E-2	3	-100	19%	6 EW	2 N-1	8	50	19%
3 EW	4 W=	10	620	75%	7 EW	1 S+2	6	-110	69%
4 EW	4 S+2	A	-680	69%	8 EW	2NTW-3	6	-150	0%
Percentage 44.53%

______________________________________________________________________

8 KAYOKO MIKI & PRUDIE WAGNER

Round 2

vs 9 ADEL ABDELHAMID & ELLA LUPUL

NS 5		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	3 S-2	6	-100	38%	5 NS	3NTN=	2	600	32%
2 NS	3 E-2	4	100	82%	6 NS	3NTS-3	5	-150	25%
3 NS	4 E=	A	-620	25%	7 NS	1 S+2	3	110	32%
4 NS	4 S+2	K	680	32%	8 NS	2 W-2	A	100	25%
Percentage 35.94%

______________________________________________________________________

9 ADEL ABDELHAMID & ELLA LUPUL

Round 2

vs 8 KAYOKO MIKI & PRUDIE WAGNER

EW 5		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	3 S-2	6	100	63%	5 EW	3NTN=	2	-600	69%
2 EW	3 E-2	4	-100	19%	6 EW	3NTS-3	5	150	75%
3 EW	4 E=	A	620	75%	7 EW	1 S+2	3	-110	69%
4 EW	4 S+2	K	-680	69%	8 EW	2 W-2	A	-100	75%
Percentage 64.06%

______________________________________________________________________

10 HELEN KITE & HELEN ROLLOND

Round 2

vs 7 ANNE DAVEY & ALICE HANDLEY

NS 6		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	3NTW-1	4	50	63%	5 NS	3NTS=	5	600	32%
2 NS	4 E-2	3	100	82%	6 NS	2 N-1	8	-50	82%
3 NS	4 W=	10	-620	25%	7 NS	1 S+2	6	110	32%
4 NS	4 S+2	A	680	32%	8 NS	2NTW-3	6	150	100%
Percentage 55.47%

______________________________________________________________________

11 SALLY LUKE & GENEVIEVE PAGE

Round 2

vs 13 JIM COFFEY & MILTON HART

NS 9		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	2NTW=	4	-120	13%	5 NS	3NTS+1	4	630	75%
2 NS	4 E-2	3	100	82%	6 NS	3 S-2	A	-100	57%
3 NS	4 W=	10	-620	25%	7 NS	1 S+3	3	130	94%
4 NS	4 S+2	A	680	32%	8 NS	2 E-1	J	50	0%
Percentage 46.88%

______________________________________________________________________

12 KEN NIXON & GONZ UYTTENHOVE

Round 2

vs 14 GENEVIEVE DONNELLY & MOIRA SMITH

NS 8		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	2 S+1	6	140	100%	5 NS	3NTN+1	5	630	75%
2 NS	2 E+1	A	-140	7%	6 NS	2 S-1	A	-50	82%
3 NS	5 S=	A	450	94%	7 NS	1NTS+1	3	120	69%
4 NS	4 N+3	3	710	75%	8 NS	3 S+1	Q	130	75%
Percentage 71.88%

______________________________________________________________________

13 JIM COFFEY & MILTON HART

Round 2

vs 11 SALLY LUKE & GENEVIEVE PAGE

EW 9		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	2NTW=	4	120	88%	5 EW	3NTS+1	4	-630	25%
2 EW	4 E-2	3	-100	19%	6 EW	3 S-2	A	100	44%
3 EW	4 W=	10	620	75%	7 EW	1 S+3	3	-130	7%
4 EW	4 S+2	A	-680	69%	8 EW	2 E-1	J	-50	100%
Percentage 53.13%

______________________________________________________________________

14 GENEVIEVE DONNELLY & MOIRA SMITH

Round 2

vs 12 KEN NIXON & GONZ UYTTENHOVE

EW 8		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	2 S+1	6	-140	0%	5 EW	3NTN+1	5	-630	25%
2 EW	2 E+1	A	140	94%	6 EW	2 S-1	A	50	19%
3 EW	5 S=	A	-450	7%	7 EW	1NTS+1	3	-120	32%
4 EW	4 N+3	3	-710	25%	8 EW	3 S+1	Q	-130	25%
Percentage 28.13%

______________________________________________________________________

15 CHRIS BARNWELL & MERILYN PARIS

Round 2

vs 1 ANDREW HILL & DAVID SHILLING

NS 4		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	3 E-1	A	50	63%	5 NS	3NTS=	6	600	32%
2 NS	4 E-1	2	50	38%	6 NS	4 xN-2	8	-300	0%
3 NS	5 W=	10	-650	0%	7 NS	1NTS+1	3	120	69%
4 NS	6 N=	3	1430	94%	8 NS	2 N=	9	110	57%
Percentage 43.75%

______________________________________________________________________

16 SALLY FRASER & HELEN GRAY

Round 2

vs 6 MARC DEATON & ALICIA TERRY

EW 3		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	3NTW-1	6	-50	38%	5 EW	3 N-1	A	100	100%
2 EW	3 E-2	4	-100	19%	6 EW	3NTS-2	5	100	44%
3 EW	5 E-1	10	-100	32%	7 EW	1 S+3	3	-130	7%
4 EW	6 S=	A	-1430	7%	8 EW	2 W-2	A	-100	75%
Percentage 39.84%

______________________________________________________________________

17 DARRYL COUZNER & ROD MORITZ

Round 2

vs 18 KATRINA HEWINGS & RON LIDDY

EW 7		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	1NTW+2	2	150	100%	5 EW	3NTN+2	10	-660	0%
2 EW	2 E+1	A	140	94%	6 EW	3NTS-3	A	150	75%
3 EW	3 W+2	10	200	50%	7 EW	2 W-1	K	-100	100%
4 EW	4 S+2	A	-680	69%	8 EW	2 N=	9	-110	44%
Percentage 66.41%

______________________________________________________________________

18 KATRINA HEWINGS & RON LIDDY

Round 2

vs 17 DARRYL COUZNER & ROD MORITZ

NS 7		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section A
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	1NTW+2	2	-150	0%	5 NS	3NTN+2	10	660	100%
2 NS	2 E+1	A	-140	7%	6 NS	3NTS-3	A	-150	25%
3 NS	3 W+2	10	-200	50%	7 NS	2 W-1	K	100	0%
4 NS	4 S+2	A	680	32%	8 NS	2 N=	9	110	57%
Percentage 33.59%

______________________________________________________________________