ROUND FIVE

2017 BAROSSA TEAMS

Board by Board Summary

FREQUENCY CHART FOR BOARDS 9 TO 16


Round 5

BdScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNo
9 -670 1   -150 1   -100 1   -50 2   100 4   200 8   300 1             
10 -660 3   -630 1   -600 2   -180 1   -170 2   -150 1   -140 1   -120 2   -110 1   100 3   200 1
11 -200 2   -180 1   -150 2   -50 3   50 1   90 3   100 3   120 2   140 1       
12 -110 4   -100 1   50 2   100 2   130 5   140 2   150 2             
13 -100 4   90 1   140 5   170 5   200 1   500 1   620 1             
14 -100 6   -50 4   110 4   140 1   170 1   400 1   420 1             
15 -420 2   -400 1   -170 1   -140 4   50 9   100 1                
16 -50 1   150 1   170 1   400 2   430 9   460 1   500 1   800 2          


1 DUNBAR v 6 HOOLE

N-S Justin Williams & John ZolloE-W Milton Hart & Sharmini Hoole
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 E-2 10 200 2 S-1 3 50 250 6 90 3
101NTW+3 J-180 3NTE= 2 600 420 9 -350 5
112 S+1 3 140 1NTN-1 7 50 190 5 10 4
124 N-1 A-100 2 E-3 A -150 -250 -6 90 -5
134 N= 4 620 3 N= Q -140 480 10 140 10
144 N-2 2-100 3NTN-2 Q 100 0 0 0 -3
154 E-1 J 50 3NTE= J 400 450 10 -170 6
163NTN+1 8 430 3NTS+1 J -430 0 0 420 0
Totals  34   20
NS Ranking 11thEW Ranking 24th

______________________________________________________________________

2 DE LUCA v 9 PUSKAS

N-S Attilio De Luca & Susan EmersonE-W Gordon Fallon & Deb Wellman
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93 W-1 6 100 2 xE= 6 670 770 13 90 0
102NTE-1 2 100 3NTE+2 3 660 760 13 -350 10
111NTxW= 3-180 3NTS-4 3 200 20 1 10 -5
123 S+1 8 130 4 N+1 A -150 -20 -1 90 1
133 N= 7 140 3 N= 4 -140 0 0 140 0
142 N= 10 110 2 S-1 2 50 160 4 0 3
153 W= 7-140 4 W-1 2 -50 -190 -5 -170 1
163NTN+1 7 430 3NTS+1 J -430 0 0 420 0
Totals  25   10
NS Ranking =9thEW Ranking =14th

______________________________________________________________________

3 LUSK v 12 LEACH

N-S Adel Abdelhamid & Sue LuskE-W Robert & Tania Black
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 E-2 6 200 2 E-1 6 -100 100 3 90 3
102 W= 7-110 2 W+2 9 170 60 2 -350 6
112 E-1 2 50 2 S-1 10 50 100 3 10 1
122 E= A-110 3 S+1 8 -130 -240 -6 90 -5
133 N+1 4 170 4 N-1 4 100 270 7 140 1
144 N-2 2-100 1 N+2 2 -140 -240 -6 0 -3
154 E= J-420 4 W= 3 420 0 0 -170 -6
163NTN= 8 400 3NTN+1 8 -430 -30 -1 420 -1
Totals  2  -4
NS Ranking 27thEW Ranking =14th

______________________________________________________________________

4 ALEXANDER v 11 BROOKS

N-S Linda Alexander & Alison FallonE-W Rodney Macey & Judy Zollo
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 E-2 6 200 1 E-1 6 -100 100 3 90 3
103NTE= 2-600 3 W+1 J 170 -430 -10 -350 -6
112 xE-1 6 100 2NTN-3 7 150 250 6 10 3
123 S+1 8 130 3 E-2 K -100 30 1 90 1
133 N+1 2 170 3 N+1 Q -170 0 0 140 1
144 N-2 7-100 3 N-1 2 50 -50 -2 0 -3
154 W-1 3 50 3 W= 8 140 190 5 -170 6
163NTS+1 J 430 3NTS+1 J -430 0 0 420 0
Totals  3   5
NS Ranking 4thEW Ranking 37th

______________________________________________________________________

5 ALLANSON v 8 BRADSHAW

N-S Jill Allanson & Dianne MarlerE-W Bill Bradshaw & Peter Dieperink
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 E-2 6 200 2 E-1 6 -100 100 3 90 3
102NTE+1 J-150 3NTE+1 J 630 480 10 -350 5
113 xE-1 4 100 1NTN+1 J -120 -20 -1 10 3
123 N= A 140 3 E-1 A -50 90 3 90 2
133 N+1 A 170 3 N= Q -140 30 1 140 1
142 N= 10 110 2 N= 10 -110 0 0 0 3
154 W-1 8 50 3 E= 5 140 190 5 -170 6
162 xE-3 3 800 2 xW-2 A -500 300 7 420 9
Totals  28   32
NS Ranking 19thEW Ranking =29th

______________________________________________________________________

6 HOOLE v 1 DUNBAR

N-S Helen & Robert FleetE-W Mike Doecke & Jarrad Dunbar
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 S-1 3-50 2 E-2 10 -200 -250 -6 90 -4
103NTE= 2-600 1NTW+3 J 180 -420 -9 -350 -6
111NTN-1 7-50 2 S+1 3 -140 -190 -5 10 -2
122 E-3 A 150 4 N-1 A 100 250 6 90 2
133 N= Q 140 4 N= 4 -620 -480 -10 140 0
143NTN-2 Q-100 4 N-2 2 100 0 0 0 -3
153NTE= J-400 4 E-1 J -50 -450 -10 -170 -6
163NTS+1 J 430 3NTN+1 8 -430 0 0 420 0
Totals -34  -19
NS Ranking 16thEW Ranking 5th

______________________________________________________________________

7 JONES v 14 BURKE

N-S Les Barnett & Raymond JonesE-W Anne & Jim Burke
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 S-1 3-50 2 E-2 6 -200 -250 -6 90 -4
102NTE= 2-120 3NTE+2 2 660 540 11 -350 6
111NTW-2 7 100 1NTN= 7 -90 10 0 10 3
123 N+1 A 130 2 N+1 A -140 -10 0 90 1
131NTN= 4 90 3 N+1 Q -170 -80 -2 140 -2
144 N-2 10-100 2 N= 10 -110 -210 -5 0 -3
153 E+1 J-170 4 E-1 J -50 -220 -6 -170 0
163 N+2 9 150 5 N= 2 -400 -250 -6 420 -7
Totals -14  -6
NS Ranking =17thEW Ranking 21st

______________________________________________________________________

8 BRADSHAW v 5 ALLANSON

N-S Joanne Bakas & Corinne PatersonE-W Evan Allanson & David Brooks
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 E-1 6 100 2 E-2 6 -200 -100 -3 90 0
103NTE+1 J-630 2NTE+1 J 150 -480 -10 -350 -7
111NTN+1 J 120 3 xE-1 4 -100 20 1 10 3
123 E-1 A 50 3 N= A -140 -90 -3 90 -1
133 N= Q 140 3 N+1 A -170 -30 -1 140 0
142 N= 10 110 2 N= 10 -110 0 0 0 3
153 E= 5-140 4 W-1 8 -50 -190 -5 -170 1
162 xW-2 A 500 2 xE-3 3 -800 -300 -7 420 2
Totals -28   1
NS Ranking 13thEW Ranking 12th

______________________________________________________________________

9 PUSKAS v 2 DE LUCA

N-S John Puskas & Julie SavageE-W Felicity Smyth & Jeff Travis
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 xE= 6-670 3 W-1 6 -100 -770 -13 90 -13
103NTE+2 3-660 2NTE-1 2 -100 -760 -13 -350 -7
113NTS-4 3-200 1NTxW= 3 180 -20 -1 10 -5
124 N+1 A 150 3 S+1 8 -130 20 1 90 2
133 N= 4 140 3 N= 7 -140 0 0 140 0
142 S-1 2-50 2 N= 10 -110 -160 -4 0 -2
154 W-1 2 50 3 W= 7 140 190 5 -170 6
163NTS+1 J 430 3NTN+1 7 -430 0 0 420 0
Totals -25  -19
NS Ranking 20thEW Ranking 8th

______________________________________________________________________

10 KITE v 15 HARTLEY

N-S Helen Kite & Helen RollondE-W Di Gilbert & Kate Hartley
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 E-2 6 200 3 S-3 3 150 350 8 90 3
102NTE-1 3 100 3 W-1 J -100 0 0 -350 10
111NTN= 6 90 1NTN= 5 -90 0 0 10 2
121 E+1 A-110 3 xE-1 A -100 -210 -5 90 -5
134 N-1 4-100 3 N= Q -140 -240 -6 140 -6
142 N+2 2 170 4 N-1 2 50 220 6 0 5
153 W= 2-140 4 W-1 10 -50 -190 -5 -170 1
163NTN+1 8 430 3NTS+2 9 -460 -30 -1 420 0
Totals -3   10
NS Ranking 1stEW Ranking 33rd

______________________________________________________________________

11 BROOKS v 4 ALEXANDER

N-S Bevin Brooks & Ingrid CookeE-W Gamini Amerasinghe & Jeff Fallon
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
91 E-1 6 100 2 E-2 6 -200 -100 -3 90 0
103 W+1 J-170 3NTE= 2 600 430 10 -350 5
112NTN-3 7-150 2 xE-1 6 -100 -250 -6 10 -4
123 E-2 K 100 3 S+1 8 -130 -30 -1 90 0
133 N+1 Q 170 3 N+1 2 -170 0 0 140 1
143 N-1 2-50 4 N-2 7 100 50 2 0 -2
153 W= 8-140 4 W-1 3 -50 -190 -5 -170 1
163NTS+1 J 430 3NTS+1 J -430 0 0 420 0
Totals -3   1
NS Ranking =2ndEW Ranking 31st

______________________________________________________________________

12 LEACH v 3 LUSK

N-S Brian & Carolyn LeachE-W Ian Hilditch & David Lusk
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 E-1 6 100 2 E-2 6 -200 -100 -3 90 0
102 W+2 9-170 2 W= 7 110 -60 -2 -350 5
112 S-1 10-50 2 E-1 2 -50 -100 -3 10 -2
123 S+1 8 130 2 E= A 110 240 6 90 1
134 N-1 4-100 3 N+1 4 -170 -270 -7 140 -6
141 N+2 2 140 4 N-2 2 100 240 6 0 4
154 W= 3-420 4 E= J 420 0 0 -170 -6
163NTN+1 8 430 3NTN= 8 -400 30 1 420 0
Totals -2  -4
NS Ranking 6thEW Ranking =2nd

______________________________________________________________________

13 BRADY v 16 HAYLES

N-S Chris Brady & Elaine KennyE-W Sue Longstaff & Kathy McDonald
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 S-2 3-100 2 E-2 6 -200 -300 -7 90 -5
102NTE= 5-120 2 W+1 7 140 20 1 -350 6
111NTN-1 7-50 1NTW+2 J 150 100 3 10 -2
122 E-1 A 50 2 E= A 110 160 4 90 -1
134 N-1 4-100 5 xW-2 A -500 -600 -12 140 -6
143NTN-2 9-100 4 N= 10 -420 -520 -11 0 -3
153 W-1 A 50 4 E-2 A -100 -50 -2 -170 6
165 N-1 J-50 3 N+3 J -170 -220 -6 420 -10
Totals -30  -15
NS Ranking 32ndEW Ranking 26th

______________________________________________________________________

14 BURKE v 7 JONES

N-S Colin & Jude TwelftreeE-W Trevor Darling & Rita Jones
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 E-2 6 200 2 S-1 3 50 250 6 90 3
103NTE+2 2-660 2NTE= 2 120 -540 -11 -350 -7
111NTN= 7 90 1NTW-2 7 -100 -10 0 10 2
122 N+1 A 140 3 N+1 A -130 10 0 90 2
133 N+1 Q 170 1NTN= 4 -90 80 2 140 1
142 N= 10 110 4 N-2 10 100 210 5 0 3
154 E-1 J 50 3 E+1 J 170 220 6 -170 6
165 N= 2 400 3 N+2 9 -150 250 6 420 -1
Totals  14   9
NS Ranking =17thEW Ranking 28th

______________________________________________________________________

15 HARTLEY v 10 KITE

N-S Catherine Ellice-Flint & Robert MartinE-W Jane Caddy & Merilyn Paris
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93 S-3 3-150 2 E-2 6 -200 -350 -8 90 -6
103 W-1 J 100 2NTE-1 3 -100 0 0 -350 10
111NTN= 5 90 1NTN= 6 -90 0 0 10 2
123 xE-1 A 100 1 E+1 A 110 210 5 90 0
133 N= Q 140 4 N-1 4 100 240 6 140 0
144 N-1 2-50 2 N+2 2 -170 -220 -6 0 -2
154 W-1 10 50 3 W= 2 140 190 5 -170 6
163NTS+2 9 460 3NTN+1 8 -430 30 1 420 1
Totals  3   11
NS Ranking 7thEW Ranking 36th

______________________________________________________________________

16 HAYLES v 13 BRADY

N-S Anita Frith & Antonina HaylesE-W Barbara Keil & Cecile Schryver
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 E-2 6 200 2 S-2 3 100 300 7 90 3
102 W+1 7-140 2NTE= 5 120 -20 -1 -350 5
111NTW+2 J-150 1NTN-1 7 50 -100 -3 10 -4
122 E= A-110 2 E-1 A -50 -160 -4 90 -5
135 xW-2 A 500 4 N-1 4 100 600 12 140 8
144 N= 10 420 3NTN-2 9 100 520 11 0 9
154 E-2 A 100 3 W-1 A -50 50 2 -170 7
163 N+3 J 170 5 N-1 J 50 220 6 420 -6
Totals  30   17
NS Ranking 25thEW Ranking 35th

______________________________________________________________________

17 HAAN v 18 HARMS

N-S Herb & Marg NeumeisterE-W Louisa Eggleton & Halena Frick
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93 E-3 6 300 2 E-2 6 -200 100 3 90 5
102 W-2 7 200 3NTE+2 3 660 860 13 -350 11
112NTN= 7 120 2NTN-4 7 200 320 8 10 3
124 S= 8 130 1 E+1 A 110 240 6 90 1
134 N-1 Q-100 4 E-2 4 -200 -300 -7 140 -6
144 N-1 2-50 3NTN= 10 -400 -450 -10 0 -2
154 E-1 A 50 4 W-1 3 -50 0 0 -170 6
163NTS+1 J 430 2 xE-3 J -800 -370 -9 420 0
Totals  4   18
NS Ranking 23rdEW Ranking 38th

______________________________________________________________________

18 HARMS v 17 HAAN

N-S Graham & Sirpa HarmsE-W Hans Haan & Michael Kenny
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 E-2 6 200 3 E-3 6 -300 -100 -3 90 3
103NTE+2 3-660 2 W-2 7 -200 -860 -13 -350 -7
112NTN-4 7-200 2NTN= 7 -120 -320 -8 10 -5
121 E+1 A-110 4 S= 8 -130 -240 -6 90 -5
134 E-2 4 200 4 N-1 Q 100 300 7 140 2
143NTN= 10 400 4 N-1 2 50 450 10 0 9
154 W-1 3 50 4 E-1 A -50 0 0 -170 6
162 xE-3 J 800 3NTS+1 J -430 370 9 420 9
Totals -4   12
NS Ranking =29thEW Ranking 34th

______________________________________________________________________