3 MARY GRIBBLE & KATHY SCICLUNA

Round 1

vs 13 SANDY BARNES & MARGARET DAWSON

EW 3		ST VINCENT SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	5 E=	6	400	95%	5 EW	4 N-3	10	300	100%
2 EW	5 E-2	A	-100	34%	6 EW	6 N-2	6	100	100%
3 EW	4 E+3	3	710	73%	7 EW	3 N-1	K	100	95%
4 EW	1NTE=	3	90	34%
Score 75.40%

______________________________________________________________________

3 MARY GRIBBLE & KATHY SCICLUNA

Round 2

vs 8 BEVIN BROOKS & INGRID COOKE

EW 3		ST VINCENT SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
8 EW	3 E-1	K	-50	89%	12 EW	3 xN+2	K	-1130	0%
9 EW	2 S+2	10	-170	67%	13 EW	4 N=	A	-620	12%
10 EW	3NTN-1	5	100	84%	14 EW	4 W-2	A	-100	89%
11 EW	4 E-1	8	-50	34%
Score 53.17%

______________________________________________________________________

3 MARY GRIBBLE & KATHY SCICLUNA

Round 3

vs 16 ANN LINDEN & BRONWYN SELF

EW 3		ST VINCENT SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
15 EW	4 E-1	6	-50	23%	19 EW	4 S-2	K	100	17%
16 EW	6NTE-1	K	-100	12%	20 EW	3 W=	Q	110	56%
17 EW	1NTS=	4	-90	34%	21 EW	4 W+1	J	450	39%
18 EW	4 E-2	A	-100	17%
Score 27.78%

______________________________________________________________________

3 MARY GRIBBLE & KATHY SCICLUNA

Round 4

vs 14 AMAL BABASHAQ & EMILIA TYBORCZYK

EW 3		ST VINCENT SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
22 EW	4 N-1	10	50	73%	26 EW	2 W-1	6	-100	6%
23 EW	2NTW+1	Q	150	78%	27 EW	4 E+1	A	450	100%
24 EW	4 N=	9	-420	39%	28 EW	4 W=	2	130	39%
25 EW	4 E+2	10	680	62%
Score 56.35%

______________________________________________________________________