4 LUSK

ROUND ONE

vs 3 ZOLLO

N-S Alison & Gordon Fallon					E-W David & Sue Lusk
vs Peter Chan & John Kikkert					vs Jeff Travis & John Zollo
Brd	NS Cont.	Lead	NS Score	EW Cont.	Lead	EW Score	Net	Imps
1	2 W+1	5	-140	3 W=	K	140	0	0
2	3 W=	4	-140	2 W=	K	110	-30	-1
3	2 N-3	10	-150	5 W-2	Q	-200	-350	-8
4	2 N=	J	90	3 N=	10	-110	-20	-1
5	2NTE=	10	-120	3NTW-2	7	-100	-220	-6
6	1NTW+1	6	-120	2 E+2	6	170	50	2
7	5 N-1	7	-100	4 N=	J	-620	-720	-12
8	3 W-1	8	50	2 W=	2	110	160	4
9	4 N+1	K	450	4 N+1	A	-450	0	0
10	2NTW+1	5	-150	2NTW+1	5	150	0	0
11	2 W+1	J	-140	3 E+1	8	130	-10	0
12	2 N=	A	110	3 E=	J	110	220	6
13	1NTS+2	9	150	1NTS+2	10	-150	0	0
14	5 xE-3	K	500	2 S=	2	-110	390	9
Total								-7

______________________________________________________________________

4 LUSK

ROUND TWO

vs 3 ZOLLO

N-S Alison & Gordon Fallon					E-W David & Sue Lusk
vs Peter Chan & John Kikkert					vs Jeff Travis & John Zollo
Brd	NS Cont.	Lead	NS Score	EW Cont.	Lead	EW Score	Net	Imps
15	3 E=	4	-140	4 E-1	2	-50	-190	-5
16	4 N-2	A	-100	3NTS-1	K	50	-50	-2
17	6 N=	10	980	6 S-1	2	50	1030	14
18	1NTE+1	6	-120	2NTE+1	3	150	30	1
19	3NTW=	10	-600	4 W-1	J	-100	-700	-12
20	4 S+2	9	680	4 N=	A	-620	60	2
21	3NTN-4	3	-400	4 E-2	2	-100	-500	-11
22	4 E-1	10	100	4 E-1	10	-100	0	0
23	1NTE=	10	-90	1NTE+1	6	120	30	1
24	5 xE-2	K	300	4 xE-1	K	-100	200	5
25	4 E=	K	-620	4 E=	K	620	0	0
26	3 E-2	9	200	2 W+3	7	150	350	8
27	3 E+2	6	-150	5 W=	K	400	250	6
28	3 E-2	3	100	3 E-3	3	-150	-50	-2
Total								5

______________________________________________________________________