ROUND TWO

RIVERLAND TEAMS

Board by Board Summary

FREQUENCY CHART FOR BOARDS 9 TO 16


Round 2

BdScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNoScoreNo
9 -100 1   110 1   130 1   140 1   150 2   180 1   400 7             
10 -400 1   -100 3   90 2   110 1   120 2   140 2   170 2   620 1          
11 -450 2   -400 2   -170 2   -150 1   -130 3   -110 1   50 1   100 2          
12 -100 1   120 1   150 1   170 1   180 1   200 3   600 5   660 1          
13 -660 2   -630 5   -600 2   -210 2   -180 1   200 1   300 1             
14 -450 1   -420 1   -300 2   -170 1   -140 1   -100 1   50 4   100 1   150 1   800 1    
15 -300 1   -200 2   -120 1   -100 4   -90 1   90 2   120 3             
16 -620 2   -150 1   -140 2   -100 1   -50 3   100 2   200 2   300 1          


1 WILLIAMS v 6 WARD

N-S Felicity Smyth & Jeff TravisE-W Jill Byrne & Sue Ormsby
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93NTN= 2 400 2NTS+1 J -150 250 6 280 3
101NTS+1 9 120 2 S= K -110 10 0 80 1
115 E= 8-400 4 W-2 7 -100 -500 -11 -170 -6
123NTS= J 600 2 N+3 2 -200 400 9 350 6
134 E-3 5 300 3NTW+1 2 630 930 14 -490 13
144 W-1 K 50 4 W-1 K -50 0 0 -70 3
151NTS+1 9 120 1NTS-1 3 100 220 6 -50 5
164 xN-1 10-100 4 E= 10 620 520 11 -30 -2
Totals  35   23
NS Ranking =2ndEW Ranking =21st

______________________________________________________________________

2 DE LUCA v 4 ALLANSON

N-S Judy Hocking & Kevin LangeE-W Evan Allanson & David Brooks
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93NTS= 6 400 3NTS-2 J 100 500 11 280 3
104 S-1 9-100 2 S+1 7 -140 -240 -6 80 -5
113 E+3 8-170 3 E+1 8 130 -40 -1 -170 0
123NTS+2 3 660 3NTS= 3 -600 60 2 350 7
133NTW= 2-600 3NTW+1 2 630 30 1 -490 -3
145 xW-4 A 800 4 W-1 7 -50 750 13 -70 13
151NTS+1 6 120 2 W= A 90 210 5 -50 5
163 W-2 A 200 4 W-1 A -100 100 3 -30 6
Totals  28   26
NS Ranking 1stEW Ranking 19th

______________________________________________________________________

3 MOLLER v 5 MARLER

N-S Susan Britton & Peter MollerE-W Linda Alexander & Dianne Marler
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93NTS= 10 400 3 S+1 5 -130 270 7 280 3
101NTS+1 7 120 2 S+1 K -140 -20 -1 80 1
114 E+1 8-450 4 E-2 6 -100 -550 -11 -170 -7
124 N-1 8-100 3NTS= Q -600 -700 -12 350 -10
133NTW+1 3-630 3NTW+2 2 660 30 1 -490 -4
143 W= 8-140 4 W+1 K 450 310 7 -70 -2
151NTS+1 6 120 1NTE+1 J 120 240 6 -50 5
162 W-1 A 100 4 E= 10 620 720 12 -30 4
Totals  9  -10
NS Ranking 15thEW Ranking 7th

______________________________________________________________________

4 ALLANSON v 2 DE LUCA

N-S Jill Allanson & Angela NorrisE-W Attilio De Luca & Susan Emerson
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93NTS-2 J-100 3NTS= 6 -400 -500 -11 280 -9
102 S+1 7 140 4 S-1 9 100 240 6 80 2
113 E+1 8-130 3 E+3 8 170 40 1 -170 1
123NTS= 3 600 3NTS+2 3 -660 -60 -2 350 6
133NTW+1 2-630 3NTW= 2 600 -30 -1 -490 -4
144 W-1 7 50 5 xW-4 A -800 -750 -13 -70 3
152 W= A-90 1NTS+1 6 -120 -210 -5 -50 -1
164 W-1 A 100 3 W-2 A -200 -100 -3 -30 4
Totals -28   2
NS Ranking 4thEW Ranking 8th

______________________________________________________________________

5 MARLER v 3 MOLLER

N-S Sue Hapek & Barbara NormanE-W George Evans & Lauren Travis
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93 S+1 5 130 3NTS= 10 -400 -270 -7 280 -4
102 S+1 K 140 1NTS+1 7 -120 20 1 80 2
114 E-2 6 100 4 E+1 8 450 550 11 -170 7
123NTS= Q 600 4 N-1 8 100 700 12 350 6
133NTW+2 2-660 3NTW+1 3 630 -30 -1 -490 -5
144 W+1 K-450 3 W= 8 140 -310 -7 -70 -9
151NTE+1 J-120 1NTS+1 6 -120 -240 -6 -50 -2
164 E= 10-620 2 W-1 A -100 -720 -12 -30 -11
Totals -9  -16
NS Ranking =24thEW Ranking =2nd

______________________________________________________________________

6 WARD v 1 WILLIAMS

N-S Chris Nettle & Michael WardE-W Paul Hudson & Justin Williams
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92NTS+1 J 150 3NTN= 2 -400 -250 -6 280 -4
102 S= K 110 1NTS+1 9 -120 -10 0 80 1
114 W-2 7 100 5 E= 8 400 500 11 -170 7
122 N+3 2 200 3NTS= J -600 -400 -9 350 -4
133NTW+1 2-630 4 E-3 5 -300 -930 -14 -490 -4
144 W-1 K 50 4 W-1 K -50 0 0 -70 3
151NTS-1 3-100 1NTS+1 9 -120 -220 -6 -50 -2
164 E= 10-620 4 xN-1 10 100 -520 -11 -30 -11
Totals -35  -14
NS Ranking 10thEW Ranking 5th

______________________________________________________________________

7 MROCZEK v 8 GERBER

N-S Lyn & Michael HarrisE-W Rod Moritz & Ian Sando
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92NTS+1 150 3NTS= 4 -400 -250 -6 280 -4
101NTS 90 4 N= 7 -620 -530 -11 80 0
113 E+3-170 3 E= 3 110 -60 -2 -170 0
122 N+3 200 2NTS= Q -120 80 2 350 -4
133NTE+1-630 3NTW= 2 600 -30 -1 -490 -4
144 W-2 100 4 W-1 2 -50 50 2 -70 5
151NTS-1-100 1NTS-2 3 200 100 3 -50 -2
162 W+1-140 3 E-3 10 -300 -440 -10 -30 -3
Totals -23  -12
NS Ranking =21stEW Ranking 11th

______________________________________________________________________

8 GERBER v 7 MROCZEK

N-S Margaret & Wolfgang GerberE-W Carolyn & Chris Mroczek
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93NTS= 4 400 2NTS+1 -150 250 6 280 3
104 N= 7 620 1NTS -90 530 11 80 11
113 E= 3-110 3 E+3 170 60 2 -170 2
122NTS= Q 120 2 N+3 -200 -80 -2 350 -6
133NTW= 2-600 3NTE+1 630 30 1 -490 -3
144 W-1 2 50 4 W-2 -100 -50 -2 -70 3
151NTS-2 3-200 1NTS-1 100 -100 -3 -50 -4
163 E-3 10 300 2 W+1 140 440 10 -30 8
Totals  23   14
NS Ranking 9thEW Ranking 29th

______________________________________________________________________

10 ELLIOTT v 14 BRADY

N-S John & Pat ElliottE-W Chris Brady & Barbara Keil
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93NTS= K 400 3NTN= 2 -400 0 0 280 3
102 S+2 9 170 1NTS= 5 -90 80 2 80 3
113 E+2 8-150 4 W-1 7 -50 -200 -5 -170 1
123NTS= 4 600 3NTS= Q -600 0 0 350 6
132NTW+3 2-210 3NTW+2 2 660 450 10 -490 7
145 xS-2 A-300 2NTS+1 A -150 -450 -10 -70 -6
151NTS= 2 90 1NTS-1 5 100 190 5 -50 4
164 W-2 K 200 4 N-1 5 50 250 6 -30 6
Totals  8   24
NS Ranking 13thEW Ranking =24th

______________________________________________________________________

11 YATES v 13 ROBERTSON

N-S Sue Ryan & Gwen WilsonE-W Gerry Robertson & Dee Simpson
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93NTN= 3 400 2 S+1 3 -140 260 6 280 3
104 N-4 Q-400 4 N-1 Q 100 -300 -7 80 -10
114 W+1 6-450 2 E+2 10 130 -320 -8 -170 -7
121NTS+2 3 150 1 N+3 6 -170 -20 -1 350 -5
132NTW+3 2-210 2NTW+2 6 180 -30 -1 -490 7
144 S-2 A-100 4 W= K 420 320 8 -70 -1
151NTS-3 3-300 1NTS-1 3 100 -200 -5 -50 -6
162 N-1 5-50 4 N-3 2 150 100 3 -30 -1
Totals -5  -20
NS Ranking =27thEW Ranking 20th

______________________________________________________________________

12 SMITH v 15 ARTHUR

N-S Jean De Caux & Mary HannE-W Anna Burroughs & Glenda Moyle
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93 N= 2 110 2NTS+2 4 -180 -70 -2 280 -5
102 N-1 10-100 2 N+2 A -170 -270 -7 80 -5
113NTE= 6-400 3 E+1 8 130 -270 -7 -170 -6
123 N+2 3 200 1NTS+3 3 -180 20 1 350 -4
134NTW= 2-630 4 W-2 3 -200 -830 -13 -490 -4
144NTxS-2 A-300 3 W+1 A 170 -130 -4 -70 -6
151NTxN-1 3-200 1NTS= 3 -90 -290 -7 -50 -4
162 W+1 2-140 3 N-1 5 50 -90 -3 -30 -3
Totals -42  -37
NS Ranking 30thEW Ranking 12th

______________________________________________________________________

13 ROBERTSON v 11 YATES

N-S Ann Lowe & Shirley WakefieldE-W Jan Sunstrom & Kate Yates
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92 S+1 3 140 3NTN= 3 -400 -260 -6 280 -4
104 N-1 Q-100 4 N-4 Q 400 300 7 80 -5
112 E+2 10-130 4 W+1 6 450 320 8 -170 1
121 N+3 6 170 1NTS+2 3 -150 20 1 350 -5
132NTW+2 6-180 2NTW+3 2 210 30 1 -490 7
144 W= K-420 4 S-2 A 100 -320 -8 -70 -8
151NTS-1 3-100 1NTS-3 3 300 200 5 -50 -2
164 N-3 2-150 2 N-1 5 50 -100 -3 -30 -3
Totals  5  -19
NS Ranking =27thEW Ranking 18th

______________________________________________________________________

14 BRADY v 10 ELLIOTT

N-S Elaine & Michael KennyE-W Beverley Dalzell & Margaret Phillips
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
93NTN= 2 400 3NTS= K -400 0 0 280 3
101NTS= 5 90 2 S+2 9 -170 -80 -2 80 0
114 W-1 7 50 3 E+2 8 150 200 5 -170 6
123NTS= Q 600 3NTS= 4 -600 0 0 350 6
133NTW+2 2-660 2NTW+3 2 210 -450 -10 -490 -5
142NTS+1 A 150 5 xS-2 A 300 450 10 -70 6
151NTS-1 5-100 1NTS= 2 -90 -190 -5 -50 -2
164 N-1 5-50 4 W-2 K -200 -250 -6 -30 -1
Totals -8   13
NS Ranking 14thEW Ranking 26th

______________________________________________________________________

15 ARTHUR v 12 SMITH

N-S Sue Arthur & Jan JappE-W Pat Luitjes & Helen Smith
BrdNS Cont.LeadNS ScoreOth. Cont.LeadOth. TableNetImpsDatumNS Datum
92NTS+2 4 180 3 N= 2 -110 70 2 280 -3
102 N+2 A 170 2 N-1 10 100 270 7 80 3
113 E+1 8-130 3NTE= 6 400 270 7 -170 1
121NTS+3 3 180 3 N+2 3 -200 -20 -1 350 -5
134 W-2 3 200 4NTW= 2 630 830 13 -490 12
143 W+1 A-170 4NTxS-2 A 300 130 4 -70 -3
151NTS= 3 90 1NTxN-1 3 200 290 7 -50 4
163 N-1 5-50 2 W+1 2 140 90 3 -30 -1
Totals  42   8
NS Ranking 17thEW Ranking 23rd

______________________________________________________________________