12 ADEL ABDELHAMID & SUE LUSK

Round 1

vs 6 GLEN ASHMORE & JEAN FARRY

NS 1			2016 SENIORS TRIALS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	3 E+2	2	-200	-2	-150	7 NS	3 N-1	7	-100	-4	60
2 NS	3 W-1	A	50	4	-90	8 NS	4 S+1	7	450	0	440
3 NS	3 E=	8	-110	11	-610	9 NS	3NTW-3	10	300	4	150
4 NS	2 E+2	5	-170	0	-160	10 NS	4 W+1	7	-650	-1	-630
5 NS	2 N-1	5	-100	0	-100	11 NS	5 W-1	A	50	3	-70
6 NS	3 S-2	A	-100	-2	-50	12 NS	3NTN+4	10	720	1	680
Net Imps 14

______________________________________________________________________

12 ADEL ABDELHAMID & SUE LUSK

Round 2

vs 4 BOB CLARKE & ARTHUR PORTER

NS 1			2016 SENIORS TRIALS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG
13 NS	2 N+1	K	110	3	20	19 NS	4 N-1	4	-50	-5	150
14 NS	3NTS=	K	400	8	80	20 NS	3NTW+1	A	-630	-1	-610
15 NS	3 W-1	J	50	-2	110	21 NS	4 W=	10	-420	-3	-330
16 NS	3NTW-2	8	200	7	-70	22 NS	1NTE+1	6	-120	-1	-90
17 NS	3NTS=	10	400	0	400	23 NS	4 E-1	K	100	3	-20
18 NS	2 W+2	A	-170	-1	-140	24 NS	4 N+1	J	450	1	430
Net Imps 9

______________________________________________________________________

12 ADEL ABDELHAMID & SUE LUSK

Round 3

vs 10 DAVID CHERRY & JOFF MIDDLETON

NS 1			2016 SENIORS TRIALS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG
25 NS	4 S-3	2	-150	-1	-130	31 NS	4 W-2	2	100	3	-10
26 NS	4 W=	A	-620	0	-620	32 NS	3 S-1	8	-50	-6	170
27 NS	3NTS-1	Q	-50	-2	30	33 NS	3 N+2	2	200	-5	390
28 NS	3NTE=	6	-400	-9	-30	34 NS	3NTW+2	8	-460	-1	-420
29 NS	2 E=	A	-90	-4	70	35 NS	4 S=	A	420	6	160
30 NS	3NTS+2	5	460	0	450	36 NS	2 W+1	5	-110	-5	70
Net Imps -24

______________________________________________________________________

12 ADEL ABDELHAMID & SUE LUSK

Round 4

vs 3 ANDY BABISZEWSKI & PETER CHAN

NS 1			2016 SENIORS TRIALS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	6 E=	4	-980	-6	-730	7 NS	4 W+3	3	-710	-5	-510
2 NS	1NTxW-3	3	500	10	70	8 NS	4 S+3	7	510	-6	740
3 NS	2 N-2	8	-100	0	-110	9 NS	3NTS=	2	400	1	370
4 NS	2 E-1	5	100	-2	160	10 NS	2 E-2	Q	200	1	180
5 NS	3NTN=	9	600	0	600	11 NS	3 N-2	A	-100	-4	60
6 NS	3 W+1	K	-130	-2	-70	12 NS	3NTN+1	5	630	0	640
Net Imps -13

______________________________________________________________________

12 ADEL ABDELHAMID & SUE LUSK

Round 5

vs 5 ANDREW HILL & DAVID SHILLING

NS 1			2016 SENIORS TRIALS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG
13 NS	2 E-1	K	100	3	-10	19 NS	2NTS=	2	120	0	130
14 NS	2 W=	Q	-110	-3	10	20 NS	3NTE=	K	-600	-5	-390
15 NS	3 N-2	4	-200	-3	-100	21 NS	7 E-3	7	150	-11	700
16 NS	4 S=	8	420	3	310	22 NS	3 N-1	10	-50	-1	-10
17 NS	2 E+1	10	-140	0	-140	23 NS	3NTW=	K	-600	0	-600
18 NS	3NTS+2	4	660	1	640	24 NS	4 xE-4	K	800	7	490
Net Imps -9

______________________________________________________________________

12 ADEL ABDELHAMID & SUE LUSK

Round 6

vs 9 ANN CLARKE & CHRIS LORIMER

NS 1			2016 SENIORS TRIALS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG
25 NS	1NTE+1	9	-120	-2	-40	31 NS	2 E=	K	-110	-6	110
26 NS	3NTE=	8	-600	0	-610	32 NS	3 E+1	Q	-170	1	-190
27 NS	2 xN-3	K	-500	-2	-420	33 NS	3 N+1	2	130	0	130
28 NS	2 W+1	Q	-110	-3	-10	34 NS	4 W=	3	-420	-4	-290
29 NS	6 S=	8	1430	0	1420	35 NS	4 N+1	K	450	0	460
30 NS	5 W+1	7	-420	1	-440	36 NS	4 S+1	6	650	0	650
Net Imps -15

______________________________________________________________________

12 ADEL ABDELHAMID & SUE LUSK

Round 7

vs 1 ROGER JANUSZKE & JOHN ZOLLO

NS 1			2016 SENIORS TRIALS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	3NTN=	5	400	4	270	7 NS	4 W=	5	-620	-12	100
2 NS	5 W-2	8	100	2	50	8 NS	4 E=	A	-420	-5	-220
3 NS	3NTE=	2	-600	-8	-250	9 NS	5 E=	J	-600	-10	-160
4 NS	4 N=	K	620	4	480	10 NS	3 E=	4	-140	-3	-20
5 NS	3 W-2	A	100	-9	470	11 NS	3 E-1	J	50	1	30
6 NS	2 S+1	A	110	1	70	12 NS	2 E+2	Q	-170	-2	-120
Net Imps -37

______________________________________________________________________

12 ADEL ABDELHAMID & SUE LUSK

Round 8

vs 11 ANGELA NORRIS & JOHN SMITH

NS 1			2016 SENIORS TRIALS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG
13 NS	4 N+2	K	680	0	680	19 NS	2 N+1	6	140	4	0
14 NS	2NTS=	2	120	1	90	20 NS	4 S=	6	620	9	240
15 NS	3NTW+1	4	-430	0	-430	21 NS	3 S+1	9	130	2	70
16 NS	4 S-1	K	-50	-4	80	22 NS	5 xS-2	7	-300	-5	-110
17 NS	7 N=	4	1510	6	1260	23 NS	3 S=	J	140	3	20
18 NS	3 S-2	K	-200	6	-420	24 NS	6 E=	A	-980	-11	-480
Net Imps 11

______________________________________________________________________

12 ADEL ABDELHAMID & SUE LUSK

Round 9

vs 7 DAVID ANDERSON & GEORGE SMOLANKO

NS 1			2016 SENIORS TRIALS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG
25 NS	4 E-1	2	100	4	-50	31 NS	3NTE+1	7	-430	0	-430
26 NS	4 N-5	7	-500	-7	-220	32 NS	3NTW=	4	-600	-3	-500
27 NS	4 S+3	Q	510	1	490	33 NS	5 N+1	4	420	-1	450
28 NS	4 N-1	3	-100	-11	400	34 NS	7 S-1	10	-100	-14	860
29 NS	4 W+2	10	-680	-5	-470	35 NS	4 N+1	2	450	0	450
30 NS	5 xS-1	8	-100	-6	160	36 NS	3NTE+1	J	-630	0	-630
Net Imps -42

______________________________________________________________________

12 ADEL ABDELHAMID & SUE LUSK

Round 10

vs 8 GORDON FALLON & REX WHITFORD

NS 1			2016 SENIORS TRIALS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG
1 NS	3 W=	6	-110	-5	80	7 NS	5 xE=	A	-850	-4	-720
2 NS	4 N-1	5	-100	-4	50	8 NS	3NTS+2	6	460	8	100
3 NS	5 xW=	A	-850	-4	-700	9 NS	4 N-1	Q	-50	-4	90
4 NS	3NTW+1	2	-630	-7	-360	10 NS	5 E=	2	-600	-9	-200
5 NS	3NTE=	7	-400	-3	-290	11 NS	4 E-1	J	50	2	-30
6 NS	3NTE+1	3	-630	-1	-610	12 NS	3 N-1	4	-100	-5	110
Net Imps -36

______________________________________________________________________

12 ADEL ABDELHAMID & SUE LUSK

Round 11

vs 2 JUDY HOCKING & KEVIN LANGE

NS 1			2016 SENIORS TRIALS
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	IMPS	SENIORS AVG
13 NS	6 E=	Q	-1370	-8	-1010	19 NS	2 N+2	3	170	2	90
14 NS	1NTW+4	10	-210	-2	-160	20 NS	4 S+2	K	680	0	680
15 NS	1NTN-1	5	-100	-2	-40	21 NS	4 S+1	7	650	13	-100
16 NS	3NTW-2	K	200	12	-400	22 NS	3 S=	7	140	4	0
17 NS	4 W=	2	-420	-4	-290	23 NS	5 W+1	Q	-620	-10	-180
18 NS	2 E+2	2	-170	-3	-70	24 NS	5 xS-2	K	-300	-4	-150
Net Imps -2

______________________________________________________________________