76 PHIL CHENEY & ROGER WILLIAMS

Round 7

vs 31 DEB BENNETT & PAM MORGAN-KING

EW 6		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 EW	4 N-2	100	4	40	8 EW	4 S+1	-450	-5	270
2 EW	4 xW=	590	11	-20	9 EW	3 E+1	170	0	-160
3 EW	2 W-1	-100	-5	-90	10 EW	4 S+2	-680	-1	650
4 EW	4 N+1	-650	0	650	11 EW	4 S+2	-480	0	480
5 EW	4 W+1	450	7	-150	12 EW	3NTS-1	100	3	-10
6 EW	2 S-3	150	1	-110	13 EW	4 E+1	650	0	-660
7 EW	3 W+1	130	3	-30	14 EW	4 N-1	50	10	380
Net Imps 28

______________________________________________________________________

76 PHIL CHENEY & ROGER WILLIAMS

Round 8

vs 11 JUDY HOCKING & KEVIN LANGE

NS 3		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS	4 W+2	-480	0	-480	22 NS	4 E+1	-650	0	-650
16 NS	4 W-1	100	1	80	23 NS	3 N+1	170	-1	200
17 NS	3NTS=	400	3	310	24 NS	2 E-3	150	-7	420
18 NS	5 xE-3	500	-2	550	25 NS	3NTN+2	460	0	460
19 NS	7 W=	-2210	-13	-1460	26 NS	5 E=	-600	-6	-380
20 NS	3NTW=	-600	-11	-90	27 NS	3 xS-1	-100	-6	140
21 NS	2 E-1	50	-1	70	28 NS	2 S+1	140	0	150
Net Imps -43

______________________________________________________________________

76 PHIL CHENEY & ROGER WILLIAMS

Round 9

vs 14 JESSIE DE GARIS & PHILIP MARKEY

EW 8		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 EW	4 E=	420	4	-260	8 EW	3NTE+1	430	2	-370
2 EW	1NTN-1	100	6	120	9 EW	4 W=	620	12	-20
3 EW	4 S+2	-480	-1	450	10 EW	4NTE+2	690	-13	-1440
4 EW	3 W+1	170	-3	-280	11 EW	4 S=	-420	-6	180
5 EW	4 S-1	100	-3	-190	12 EW	4 W+1	450	0	-440
6 EW	3NTS+1	-430	-10	-20	13 EW	3NTS=	-600	1	630
7 EW	1NTS=	-90	-2	20	14 EW	1NTE	90	3	10
Net Imps -10

______________________________________________________________________

76 PHIL CHENEY & ROGER WILLIAMS

Round 10

vs 78 GARY DEATON & KEN HOCKING

EW 12		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 EW	2 N+1	-140	-5	-70	22 EW	2 E+1	140	2	-70
16 EW	3 E+1	130	-3	-230	23 EW	3 W+1	170	4	-10
17 EW	3NTN=	-400	0	410	24 EW	3NTE+1	430	0	-430
18 EW	4 S=	-620	-8	290	25 EW	2 E-1	-100	-3	0
19 EW	4 N=	-420	-1	390	26 EW	4 W+2	680	1	-650
20 EW	4 E-1	-100	0	100	27 EW	4 S+3	-510	2	570
21 EW	3 N-3	300	-4	-450	28 EW	2 W-1	-50	0	40
Net Imps -15

______________________________________________________________________

76 PHIL CHENEY & ROGER WILLIAMS

Round 11

vs 32 CAROLE & JOHN FOREMAN

NS 13		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS	4 S+3	510	-5	700	8 NS	6 S+1	1010	-11	1510
2 NS	4 N+3	710	0	700	9 NS	1NTS=	90	-7	370
3 NS	2 S=	110	-1	150	10 NS	3NTW-1	100	9	-320
4 NS	6 W-2	200	8	-130	11 NS	3 E=	-140	-5	60
5 NS	4 S+1	650	8	300	12 NS	4 W=	-420	-4	-260
6 NS	4 S-1	-50	10	-540	13 NS	2 W+2	-170	-1	-140
7 NS	5 E=	-600	6	-820	14 NS	3NTN-2	-100	-5	90
Net Imps 2

______________________________________________________________________

76 PHIL CHENEY & ROGER WILLIAMS

Round 12

vs 89 PETER MIKA & ANGELA NORRIS

NS 12		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS	1NTW=	-90	0	-100	22 NS	3 W=	-140	-6	120
16 NS	2 E+2	-170	-6	50	23 NS	3NTN+2	660	1	630
17 NS	4 N-1	-50	-5	120	24 NS	3 E+1	-170	6	-420
18 NS	3NTE-1	50	6	-210	25 NS	3 E-1	100	-2	150
19 NS	4 E+1	-650	-1	-630	26 NS	4 N=	620	10	190
20 NS	1NTE-1	100	4	-50	27 NS	4 E+1	-450	-2	-380
21 NS	6NTW-1	50	14	-860	28 NS	3NTW-1	50	3	-50
Net Imps 22

______________________________________________________________________