19 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 1

vs 44 LUCY BARUA & ROSEMARY CORNISH

NS 19		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS	2 xW-3	500	10	60	8 NS	3 S+2	150	3	40
2 NS	1NTxE-4	800	11	280	9 NS	2 E=	-90	-5	90
3 NS	2NTW+4	-240	10	-670	10 NS	4 N=	620	8	290
4 NS	1NTW-2	200	0	190	11 NS	3NTN+2	460	8	140
5 NS	3NTE-1	50	5	-150	12 NS	2 W=	-110	-3	-10
6 NS	4 E=	-620	0	-620	13 NS	3NTN=	600	11	50
7 NS	2NTE+1	-150	3	-240	14 NS	3 N+1	130	2	50
Net Imps 63

______________________________________________________________________

19 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 2

vs 3 RUSSEL HARMS & JEFF TRAVIS

NS 2		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS	4 W+3	-510	0	-510	22 NS	2 E+1	-140	-1	-110
16 NS	3NTN=	400	6	140	23 NS	5 E=	-600	-11	-40
17 NS	7 xE-1	100	12	-550	24 NS	4 S+1	450	2	390
18 NS	3 E+1	-130	-4	10	25 NS	4 E+1	-650	-3	-560
19 NS	3NTE=	-600	-5	-410	26 NS	4 N+1	650	0	640
20 NS	4 E-1	100	4	-30	27 NS	2 N=	110	0	110
21 NS	1NTxN-3	-800	-12	-130	28 NS	4 E=	-420	-4	-260
Net Imps -16

______________________________________________________________________

19 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 3

vs 50 MARC DEATON & ALISON PARKER

EW 7		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 EW	6 N-2	100	9	300	8 EW	4 W+1	150	2	-100
2 EW	3NTE=	400	0	-400	9 EW	3NTN=	-400	-5	230
3 EW	4 N-1	50	3	50	10 EW	3 S+2	-150	-2	90
4 EW	Pass	0	2	60	11 EW	3NTN+3	-490	5	670
5 EW	5 S=	-650	-9	230	12 EW	5 S-1	100	3	-10
6 EW	5 xS-3	500	-12	-1110	13 EW	4 E+1	650	8	-290
7 EW	3 E+1	170	-7	-450	14 EW	2 N-2	100	3	-10
Net Imps 0

______________________________________________________________________

19 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 4

vs 9 PETER COLMER & ANDREW EDDIE

NS 10		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS	6 E=	-980	-2	-920	22 NS	3NTW+3	-690	-2	-640
16 NS	3 W-2	200	-1	220	23 NS	4 N-1	-100	-5	80
17 NS	4 N=	420	1	390	24 NS	3NTS=	400	-1	420
18 NS	3 N+2	150	-9	520	25 NS	4 E=	-620	-11	-60
19 NS	4 N-3	-150	-6	90	26 NS	5 N+1	620	2	550
20 NS	2 E+2	-170	-3	-80	27 NS	3NTN+2	460	2	410
21 NS	4 E+1	-450	-2	-370	28 NS	5 W=	-450	-8	-110
Net Imps -45

______________________________________________________________________

19 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 5

vs 32 CAROLE & JOHN FOREMAN

EW 15		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 EW	5 xN-1	100	0	-100	8 EW	5 E-2	-100	-10	-370
2 EW	5 E=	400	9	20	9 EW	4 xS-1	100	5	90
3 EW	3 W-2	-200	-3	80	10 EW	4 W-1	-100	-12	-530
4 EW	2 W=	110	-1	-150	11 EW	3NTS-1	50	11	460
5 EW	4 E=	420	0	-430	12 EW	4 W+1	450	0	-450
6 EW	3NTN+1	-430	-3	330	13 EW	2 S-3	300	-5	-500
7 EW	3NTE+2	660	1	-640	14 EW	5 S=	-400	-2	330
Net Imps -10

______________________________________________________________________

19 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 6

vs 20 LINDA BABISZEWSKI & ANN CLARKE

EW 19		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 EW	3 S-2	200	4	-60	22 EW	2 S-1	50	2	10
16 EW	2 N=	-110	-2	50	23 EW	2 S=	-110	-2	30
17 EW	5 N-1	50	8	280	24 EW	3 N+1	-130	-3	10
18 EW	2 W-1	-50	2	120	25 EW	4 W+2	680	0	-670
19 EW	3 N=	-110	0	100	26 EW	4 W-2	-200	-3	100
20 EW	2 E-2	-200	-4	50	27 EW	3NTE+4	520	1	-500
21 EW	4 E=	420	0	-420	28 EW	4 S+1	-650	-7	370
Net Imps -4

______________________________________________________________________

19 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 7

vs 48 DARRYL COUZNER & XUE KUI JI

NS 19		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS	5 N-1	-50	-3	40	8 NS	5 xE-2	300	1	270
2 NS	3NTS=	600	12	-20	9 NS	4 E-1	100	6	-160
3 NS	3 E+1	-130	-1	-90	10 NS	4 S=	620	-1	650
4 NS	4 N+1	650	0	650	11 NS	4 S+2	480	0	480
5 NS	2 W+3	-200	-2	-150	12 NS	5 xE-4	800	13	-10
6 NS	5 N-4	-200	-3	-110	13 NS	4 E+2	-680	-1	-660
7 NS	3 W+1	-130	-3	-30	14 NS	4 S+2	480	3	380
Net Imps 21

______________________________________________________________________

19 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 8

vs 35 KAYOKO MIKI & JUDITH ROBERTS

EW 15		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 EW	3NTW+3	490	0	-480	22 EW	4 E+1	650	0	-650
16 EW	4 W=	620	12	80	23 EW	4 N-1	100	7	200
17 EW	2NTN=	-120	5	310	24 EW	4 N=	-420	0	420
18 EW	4 S+1	-650	-3	550	25 EW	5 S=	-400	2	460
19 EW	6 W+1	1460	0	-1460	26 EW	3 E+2	150	-6	-380
20 EW	3NTW=	600	11	-90	27 EW	3 E-1	-50	3	140
21 EW	2NTN+1	-150	-2	70	28 EW	2 W-3	-150	0	150
Net Imps 29

______________________________________________________________________

19 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 9

vs 81 ANDY BABISZEWSKI & ATTILIO DE LUCA

EW 11		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 EW	4 E-1	-50	-7	-260	8 EW	3NTE+2	460	3	-370
2 EW	2NTS+1	-150	-1	120	9 EW	4 W-1	-100	-3	-20
3 EW	4 S+1	-450	0	450	10 EW	6NTE=	1440	0	-1440
4 EW	3 W+1	170	-3	-280	11 EW	4 S=	-420	-6	180
5 EW	4 S-1	100	-3	-190	12 EW	4 W-1	-50	-10	-440
6 EW	4 S-1	50	1	-20	13 EW	3NTS=	-600	1	630
7 EW	3 N=	-140	-3	20	14 EW	1 N=	-80	-2	10
Net Imps -33

______________________________________________________________________

19 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 10

vs 45 ALEX BREMNER & BILL LOCKWOOD

EW 15		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 EW	2 E-1	-50	-3	-70	22 EW	1NTN+1	-120	-5	-70
16 EW	3NTxW=	750	11	-230	23 EW	2 W+1	140	4	-10
17 EW	3NTN=	-400	0	410	24 EW	3NTW+1	430	0	-430
18 EW	4 S=	-620	-8	290	25 EW	1 W+1	110	3	0
19 EW	4 S=	-420	-1	390	26 EW	4 E+1	650	0	-650
20 EW	4 E-1	-100	0	100	27 EW	4 S+3	-510	2	570
21 EW	3NTW+2	460	0	-450	28 EW	2 W=	110	4	40
Net Imps 7

______________________________________________________________________

19 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 11

vs 6 DAVID PARROTT & JUSTIN WILLIAMS

NS 15		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS	4 xS+3	890	5	700	8 NS	6 S+1	1010	-11	1510
2 NS	4 S+2	680	-1	700	9 NS	2 N+2	170	-5	370
3 NS	2 S+2	170	1	150	10 NS	1NTW=	-90	6	-320
4 NS	4 E=	-620	-10	-130	11 NS	3 E+1	-170	-6	60
5 NS	4 S-1	-100	-9	300	12 NS	6 E=	-980	-12	-260
6 NS	6 W-1	100	12	-540	13 NS	2 E+2	-170	-1	-140
7 NS	6 E=	-1370	-11	-820	14 NS	4 xN-2	-300	-9	90
Net Imps -51

______________________________________________________________________

19 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 12

vs 34 MILTON HART & SHARMINI HOOLE

NS 21		2013 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS	3 W-1	50	4	-100	22 NS	5 N=	400	7	120
16 NS	4 E-3	300	6	50	23 NS	3NTN+1	630	0	630
17 NS	3 N+1	130	0	120	24 NS	6 W=	-920	-11	-420
18 NS	3NTE=	-400	-5	-210	25 NS	4 E-3	300	4	150
19 NS	4 E+1	-650	-1	-630	26 NS	3 N+1	170	-1	190
20 NS	2 N-2	-200	-4	-50	27 NS	5 E=	-450	-2	-380
21 NS	6 E=	-980	-3	-860	28 NS	3NTW-2	100	4	-50
Net Imps -2

______________________________________________________________________