18 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 1

vs 43 LUCY BARUA & MARY WATERHOUSE

EW 18		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 EW	6 W=	980	7	-690	8 EW	5 W=	400	0	-400
2 EW	4 W+2	480	1	-460	9 EW	3 S-2	100	2	-40
3 EW	3 W-2	-200	-1	160	10 EW	2 W+1	110	0	-120
4 EW	3 W=	110	2	-50	11 EW	4 S+2	-480	-2	430
5 EW	3 N+1	-170	5	380	12 EW	1NTE+3	180	3	-90
6 EW	4 W+1	650	0	-660	13 EW	2 W=	110	0	-120
7 EW	3 xE-1	-200	10	640	14 EW	4 W-2	-100	3	220
Net Imps 30

______________________________________________________________________

18 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 2

vs 21 LINDA ALEXANDER & DIANNE MARLER

EW 3		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 EW	4 E-1	-50	-2	-10	22 EW	3 N=	-140	-4	0
16 EW	3 S=	-110	-3	-10	23 EW	3 W+2	150	-8	-490
17 EW	4 N+1	-450	-5	240	24 EW	4 N=	-420	-4	270
18 EW	3 E=	110	5	60	25 EW	3 S=	-110	3	230
19 EW	4 S+1	-450	0	450	26 EW	6NTW=	1440	12	-700
20 EW	4 N-1	100	8	220	27 EW	3 N=	-140	1	170
21 EW	4 S=	-620	-5	410	28 EW	5 W=	400	7	-110
Net Imps 5

______________________________________________________________________

18 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 3

vs 10 JOHN KIKKERT & ANTHONY LUSK

NS 4		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS	4 W-1	50	8	-290	8 NS	3 N=	110	-3	210
2 NS	5 xS-2	-500	-5	-330	9 NS	2 N-1	-50	-4	80
3 NS	3NTS=	400	7	100	10 NS	2 N=	110	2	30
4 NS	3 W-2	200	4	70	11 NS	3NTW+4	-520	-2	-440
5 NS	3 W+1	-170	0	-170	12 NS	3NTW+4	-520	9	-940
6 NS	1NTW=	-90	-2	-30	13 NS	4 xW-1	200	5	-10
7 NS	4 S=	620	5	440	14 NS	5 N+1	480	1	450
Net Imps 25

______________________________________________________________________

18 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 4

vs 7 ANDY BABISZEWSKI & DAVID MIDDLETON

NS 2		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS	2 S+1	140	0	130	22 NS	4 S+2	480	-5	670
16 NS	3 E=	-140	-7	130	23 NS	1NTN=	90	3	-20
17 NS	4 E=	-420	-3	-330	24 NS	3NTW+3	-490	-1	-470
18 NS	3NTE+1	-430	-5	-220	25 NS	4 W+1	-650	0	-640
19 NS	2 N+3	200	-6	450	26 NS	3 W+3	-230	9	-620
20 NS	5 W-1	100	5	-80	27 NS	5 W=	-400	-10	50
21 NS	4 E=	-420	-7	-150	28 NS	3NTW+1	-430	0	-440
Net Imps -27

______________________________________________________________________

18 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 5

vs 20 DAVID GARLAND & JOHN ROPER

EW 5		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 EW	3NTN+1	-430	-1	400	8 EW	2 E=	110	2	-60
2 EW	5 W-2	-100	6	360	9 EW	2 E-1	-100	-1	70
3 EW	2 E+1	110	0	-120	10 EW	4 W=	130	-1	-160
4 EW	4 N-1	100	10	390	11 EW	2 N+1	-140	-3	20
5 EW	1NTW-1	-50	4	210	12 EW	3 N=	-110	-4	-20
6 EW	2 N+1	-140	-3	20	13 EW	3NTE+1	630	11	-60
7 EW	3NTS+2	-660	-1	640	14 EW	4 E-1	-50	-6	-190
Net Imps 13

______________________________________________________________________

18 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 6

vs 16 ANDREW HILL & DAVID SHILLING

EW 5		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 EW	3 S-3	300	5	-110	22 EW	4 N+1	-450	-3	360
16 EW	3NTS-2	100	7	170	23 EW	4 S-1	100	7	190
17 EW	2 S-1	50	-1	-70	24 EW	4 W-1	-50	-2	-10
18 EW	3 W+1	170	-6	-390	25 EW	4 S-1	50	0	-50
19 EW	1NTW-1	-100	-5	-100	26 EW	7 E=	2140	2	-2080
20 EW	4 N-1	100	5	80	27 EW	1NTS-1	50	-1	-70
21 EW	2 N=	-110	-2	40	28 EW	3 N=	-140	1	160
Net Imps 7

______________________________________________________________________

18 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 7

vs 5 PETER CHAN & ROGER JANUSZKE

NS 4		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS	3 N-1	-50	1	-80	8 NS	3 W-1	50	4	-80
2 NS	3 E-1	50	-11	570	9 NS	3 N+1	130	0	120
3 NS	3NTW=	-600	-11	-50	10 NS	5 N+1	620	0	620
4 NS	3NTN+2	660	0	650	11 NS	4 xN-2	-300	4	-430
5 NS	2 E+3	-200	-1	-160	12 NS	1NTW=	-90	-4	60
6 NS	4 E=	-620	-12	20	13 NS	2 N-2	-200	-6	30
7 NS	3 N+1	130	2	60	14 NS	5 xE-2	300	2	230
Net Imps -32

______________________________________________________________________

18 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 8

vs 23 YADI PARROTT & JOHN SMITH

NS 11		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS	4 N=	620	0	620	22 NS	3NTE=	-600	-2	-540
16 NS	4 E=	-620	0	-630	23 NS	3 E+2	-200	10	-660
17 NS	3NTN+3	490	1	450	24 NS	4 E-1	50	-1	70
18 NS	4 N=	620	11	120	25 NS	4 N+2	480	0	480
19 NS	4 E-2	200	3	80	26 NS	4 N=	620	3	530
20 NS	4 E=	-620	0	-630	27 NS	3NTN+1	430	4	290
21 NS	2 E=	-110	0	-100	28 NS	4 W-1	50	1	30
Net Imps 30

______________________________________________________________________

18 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 9

vs 4 NICOLAS CROFT & JOACHIM HAFFER

NS 5		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS	1NTE-1	50	1	30	8 NS	3NTN-2	-100	-6	130
2 NS	3NTN+3	690	-5	880	9 NS	2 E=	-110	-4	50
3 NS	1 S=	80	2	20	10 NS	3 N=	140	4	10
4 NS	3 W-1	100	1	60	11 NS	3NTW=	-400	-3	-300
5 NS	4 N+2	680	0	690	12 NS	4 E-2	100	2	50
6 NS	4 W=	-620	-4	-460	13 NS	4 E-2	200	7	-110
7 NS	4 S+2	680	-5	860	14 NS	3 E-1	50	1	30
Net Imps -9

______________________________________________________________________

18 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 10

vs 24 GARY DEATON & WENDY HOOPER

EW 6		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 EW	3 N+1	-170	-5	0	22 EW	1NTW-1	-100	-4	-60
16 EW	1NTN+1	-120	0	110	23 EW	3NTN+2	-660	-4	500
17 EW	3 N-3	150	2	-100	24 EW	3NTS-3	150	4	-10
18 EW	5 N+1	-620	-10	170	25 EW	4 E-3	-300	-6	80
19 EW	2NTS=	-120	-2	40	26 EW	4 W+1	650	0	-650
20 EW	4 E-1	-100	-11	-440	27 EW	5 S=	-400	-5	200
21 EW	5 xN-3	800	5	-610	28 EW	3 W+1	170	-3	-270
Net Imps -39

______________________________________________________________________

18 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 11

vs 19 PAM MORGAN-KING & LEIGH THOMPSON

EW 10		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 EW	3NTS-1	50	7	230	8 EW	3NTW=	400	5	-200
2 EW	3NTN=	-600	-5	400	9 EW	3 E-3	-300	-4	140
3 EW	3 W=	140	5	60	10 EW	2 W=	90	1	-60
4 EW	4 W=	620	-1	-640	11 EW	3NTS+2	-460	0	460
5 EW	1 W+1	110	1	-70	12 EW	3 N=	-110	-4	-50
6 EW	3NTS=	-400	-4	270	13 EW	2 S=	-110	-3	-10
7 EW	3 W+2	150	-5	-350	14 EW	3NTE+2	460	1	-430
Net Imps -6

______________________________________________________________________

18 SUSAN EMERSON & CARMEL KAIN

Round 12

vs 2 RUSSEL HARMS & JEFF TRAVIS

EW 11		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 EW	3 S+1	-130	7	400	22 EW	3NTE+2	660	1	-640
16 EW	2 N-1	50	1	-20	23 EW	4 N-1	100	-11	-650
17 EW	5 N-1	50	5	150	24 EW	3 W-1	-50	-1	30
18 EW	2 W-1	-50	1	90	25 EW	4 W+1	650	0	-640
19 EW	3 N=	-140	-3	40	26 EW	2NTS-1	100	3	10
20 EW	2 E+1	140	4	0	27 EW	3 W=	140	2	-60
21 EW	3NTE-1	-50	-10	-410	28 EW	4 N+1	-650	0	650
Net Imps -1

______________________________________________________________________