11 KEN HOCKING & GREG SARGENT

Round 1

vs 36 GAMINI AMERASINGHE & ALEX BREMNER

NS 11		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS	3NTE+2	-460	6	-690	8 NS	3 E+2	-150	6	-400
2 NS	4 W+1	-450	0	-460	9 NS	4 W=	-130	-3	-40
3 NS	5 xW-2	500	8	160	10 NS	4 W-1	100	6	-120
4 NS	3 W=	-110	-2	-50	11 NS	4 S+2	480	2	430
5 NS	2 N+2	170	-5	380	12 NS	2 S-1	-100	0	-90
6 NS	5 xN-3	-500	4	-660	13 NS	2 W=	-110	0	-120
7 NS	4 S=	620	-1	640	14 NS	5 S=	450	6	220
Net Imps 27

______________________________________________________________________

11 KEN HOCKING & GREG SARGENT

Round 2

vs 16 ANDREW HILL & DAVID SHILLING

NS 4		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS	4 E=	-420	-9	-10	22 NS	4 N-2	-100	-3	0
16 NS	1NTW=	-90	-2	-10	23 NS	4 E-4	400	13	-490
17 NS	3 W+2	-150	-9	240	24 NS	4 N=	420	4	270
18 NS	2 S+2	170	3	60	25 NS	3 N-1	-50	-7	230
19 NS	4 S+1	450	0	450	26 NS	6NTW-1	100	13	-700
20 NS	4 xW-3	800	11	220	27 NS	3NTS-2	-100	-7	170
21 NS	4 S=	620	5	410	28 NS	5NTW-1	50	4	-110
Net Imps 16

______________________________________________________________________

11 KEN HOCKING & GREG SARGENT

Round 3

vs 24 GARY DEATON & WENDY HOOPER

NS 2		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS	4 E+1	-450	-4	-290	8 NS	2 S=	110	-3	210
2 NS	4 W-1	50	9	-330	9 NS	3 S-2	-100	-5	80
3 NS	5 N-3	-150	-6	100	10 NS	2 N=	110	2	30
4 NS	3 xE-2	500	10	70	11 NS	3NTW+1	-430	0	-440
5 NS	3 xN-2	-500	-8	-170	12 NS	6 E+1	-940	0	-940
6 NS	1NTW=	-90	-2	-30	13 NS	3 W=	-140	-4	-10
7 NS	4 S=	620	5	440	14 NS	4 N+2	480	1	450
Net Imps -5

______________________________________________________________________

11 KEN HOCKING & GREG SARGENT

Round 4

vs 23 YADI PARROTT & JOHN SMITH

NS 4		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS	2 S+1	140	0	130	22 NS	6 N=	980	7	670
16 NS	2 N-2	-100	-6	130	23 NS	1NTN=	90	3	-20
17 NS	4 E+1	-450	-3	-330	24 NS	3NTE+2	-460	0	-470
18 NS	3NTE-1	50	7	-220	25 NS	4 E+1	-650	0	-640
19 NS	4 N+1	450	0	450	26 NS	2 W+4	-230	9	-620
20 NS	3NTE+2	-660	-11	-80	27 NS	5 W-1	50	0	50
21 NS	4 E-1	50	5	-150	28 NS	3NTW+2	-460	-1	-440
Net Imps 10

______________________________________________________________________

11 KEN HOCKING & GREG SARGENT

Round 5

vs 9 PETER COLMER & ANDREW EDDIE

NS 3		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS	3NTN+1	430	1	400	8 NS	3NTW-1	50	3	-60
2 NS	4 S=	620	6	360	9 NS	3 S=	110	1	70
3 NS	3 W+1	-170	-2	-120	10 NS	3 N-1	-100	2	-160
4 NS	4 N-3	-300	-12	390	11 NS	2 S=	110	3	20
5 NS	1NTN+4	210	0	210	12 NS	3NTN-4	-400	-9	-20
6 NS	2 S=	90	2	20	13 NS	5 N-1	-100	-1	-60
7 NS	3NTN+1	630	0	640	14 NS	4 xE=	-590	-9	-190
Net Imps -15

______________________________________________________________________

11 KEN HOCKING & GREG SARGENT

Round 6

vs 5 PETER CHAN & ROGER JANUSZKE

NS 7		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS	3NTE-1	50	4	-110	22 NS	4 S=	420	2	360
16 NS	3NTS+3	490	8	170	23 NS	5 S-1	-100	-7	190
17 NS	3NTN-4	-200	-4	-70	24 NS	3NTW+1	-430	-9	-10
18 NS	5 xS-2	-500	-3	-390	25 NS	4 xS-1	-100	-2	-50
19 NS	2NTW+1	-150	-2	-100	26 NS	7 E=	-2140	-2	-2080
20 NS	4 N-1	-100	-5	80	27 NS	2NTS-1	-50	1	-70
21 NS	4 xN-3	-800	-13	40	28 NS	2 N+1	140	-1	160
Net Imps -33

______________________________________________________________________

11 KEN HOCKING & GREG SARGENT

Round 7

vs 70 GLYNN EVANS & IAN HEAIRFIELD

EW 12		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 EW	3 W+2	150	2	-80	8 EW	2 W=	90	0	-80
2 EW	5 xE-3	-500	2	570	9 EW	2 S=	-110	0	120
3 EW	3NTE-1	-100	-4	-50	10 EW	5 S+1	-620	0	620
4 EW	3NTN+1	-630	1	650	11 EW	4 xS-2	300	-4	-430
5 EW	2 E+3	200	1	-160	12 EW	2 N+1	-140	-2	60
6 EW	3NTW-5	-500	-10	20	13 EW	2NTN+2	-180	-4	30
7 EW	3 W-1	-100	-1	60	14 EW	6 xW-3	-500	-7	230
Net Imps -26

______________________________________________________________________

11 KEN HOCKING & GREG SARGENT

Round 8

vs 2 RUSSEL HARMS & JEFF TRAVIS

EW 16		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 EW	4 S=	-620	0	620	22 EW	3NTW=	600	2	-540
16 EW	3NTE+2	660	1	-630	23 EW	4 E+2	680	1	-660
17 EW	3NTN+2	-460	0	450	24 EW	5 N-1	50	3	70
18 EW	6 xE-2	-300	-5	120	25 EW	6 N=	-980	-11	480
19 EW	4 E-1	-100	-1	80	26 EW	4 N+1	-650	-3	530
20 EW	4 E=	620	0	-630	27 EW	5 N=	-400	-3	290
21 EW	1NTW+1	120	1	-100	28 EW	4 W-1	-50	-1	30
Net Imps -16

______________________________________________________________________

11 KEN HOCKING & GREG SARGENT

Round 9

vs 27 LEONIE CLARKE & ANNE HARRIS

NS 19		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS	2 N=	110	2	30	8 NS	3NTS=	400	7	130
2 NS	6 S+1	1390	11	880	9 NS	3 E-1	100	2	50
3 NS	3 S-1	-50	-2	20	10 NS	3 S=	140	4	10
4 NS	3 W-1	100	1	60	11 NS	3NTW+2	-460	-4	-300
5 NS	4 N+2	680	0	690	12 NS	3 N-2	-200	-6	50
6 NS	4 W-2	200	12	-460	13 NS	3 E=	-140	-1	-110
7 NS	4 N+1	650	-5	860	14 NS	4 S-1	-50	-2	30
Net Imps 19

______________________________________________________________________

11 KEN HOCKING & GREG SARGENT

Round 10

vs 48 JINNY FUSS & STEWART KINGSBOROUGH

EW 16		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 EW	5 W-3	-150	-4	0	22 EW	3NTxS-3	500	10	-60
16 EW	3NTS-2	100	5	110	23 EW	3 S+1	-130	9	500
17 EW	3 E=	110	0	-100	24 EW	4 N-1	50	1	-10
18 EW	3NTN-1	100	7	170	25 EW	3NTE=	600	12	80
19 EW	2 S=	-90	-2	40	26 EW	4 W+1	650	0	-650
20 EW	5 xS-1	200	-6	-440	27 EW	5 N	-400	-5	200
21 EW	5 xW-1	-100	-12	-610	28 EW	4 E=	420	4	-270
Net Imps 19

______________________________________________________________________

11 KEN HOCKING & GREG SARGENT

Round 11

vs 57 SUE HAPEK & CARMEL THOMPSON

NS 14		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS	3NTS-2	-100	-8	230	8 NS	2 N-2	-100	3	-200
2 NS	4 S-1	-100	-11	400	9 NS	3 S-4	-200	-8	140
3 NS	5 N-2	-100	-4	60	10 NS	3 E=	-140	-2	-60
4 NS	3 W+2	-200	10	-640	11 NS	5 S+1	420	-1	460
5 NS	2 W-1	50	3	-70	12 NS	3 W=	-140	-3	-50
6 NS	3NTS=	400	4	270	13 NS	3 S=	140	4	-10
7 NS	3 N-1	-100	6	-350	14 NS	3 W+1	-170	6	-430
Net Imps -1

______________________________________________________________________

11 KEN HOCKING & GREG SARGENT

Round 12

vs 8 JUDY HOCKING & KEVIN LANGE

EW 14		2012 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 EW	3 xW-1	-100	7	400	22 EW	3NTE+1	630	0	-640
16 EW	2 N=	-110	-4	-20	23 EW	4 W+1	650	0	-650
17 EW	3NTN=	-400	-6	150	24 EW	4 W-1	-50	-1	30
18 EW	3 S=	-110	-1	90	25 EW	3 xN-1	100	-11	-640
19 EW	3 S-1	50	3	40	26 EW	3 S-1	100	3	10
20 EW	1NTE=	90	3	0	27 EW	3 S=	-110	-5	-60
21 EW	3NTE-1	-50	-10	-410	28 EW	4 S+1	-650	0	650
Net Imps -22

______________________________________________________________________