8 PETER CHAN & GREG SARGENT

Round 1

vs 32 DI DUNNE & EDI SFREDDO

NS 8		2011 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS		420	5	240	8 NS		50	3	-70
2 NS		-150	6	-400	9 NS		-600	1	-620
3 NS		420	1	400	10 NS		-650	0	-640
4 NS		-710	0	-700	11 NS		140	4	10
5 NS		50	9	-330	12 NS		-110	0	-110
6 NS		-100	-4	50	13 NS		-100	1	-140
7 NS		-650	0	-650	14 NS		-100	2	-180
Net Imps 28

______________________________________________________________________

8 PETER CHAN & GREG SARGENT

Round 2

vs 13 BARBARA & LAUREN TRAVIS

NS 2		2011 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS		140	3	50	22 NS		-660	-1	-630
16 NS		110	3	10	23 NS		90	3	-10
17 NS		-300	-3	-200	24 NS		-100	-2	-30
18 NS		-800	-12	-60	25 NS		450	2	370
19 NS		-50	-3	60	26 NS		620	1	580
20 NS		-600	0	-600	27 NS		-50	-2	0
21 NS		-150	-4	0	28 NS		90	2	40
Net Imps -13

______________________________________________________________________

8 PETER CHAN & GREG SARGENT

Round 3

vs 51 WALTER KUIPER & FERDINAND MEERBACH

EW 7		2011 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 EW		170	4	-30	8 EW		420	0	-420
2 EW		-650	0	660	9 EW		620	0	-610
3 EW		100	11	420	10 EW		150	1	-130
4 EW		-620	0	610	11 EW		450	2	-390
5 EW		420	6	-200	12 EW		100	3	0
6 EW		-170	-4	30	13 EW		90	1	-70
7 EW		-1370	-12	730	14 EW		100	3	-10
Net Imps 15

______________________________________________________________________

8 PETER CHAN & GREG SARGENT

Round 4

vs 23 SUSAN EMERSON & YADI PARROTT

EW 5		2011 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 EW		200	-2	-260	22 EW		650	-11	-1200
16 EW		-200	0	200	23 EW		-140	-3	50
17 EW		430	0	-430	24 EW		140	4	20
18 EW		430	0	-430	25 EW		-480	0	470
19 EW		680	2	-610	26 EW		100	0	-90
20 EW		630	0	-640	27 EW		100	0	-100
21 EW		-120	0	110	28 EW		980	6	-730
Net Imps -4

______________________________________________________________________

8 PETER CHAN & GREG SARGENT

Round 5

vs 1 DAVID MIDDLETON & ZOLLY NAGY

NS 7		2011 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS		-490	-1	-470	8 NS		-430	-11	130
2 NS		660	11	140	9 NS		-50	-4	110
3 NS		420	3	330	10 NS		-200	8	-530
4 NS		-110	-2	-50	11 NS		-650	-3	-560
5 NS		620	0	620	12 NS		-110	-2	-50
6 NS		-50	-7	250	13 NS		500	13	-270
7 NS		620	7	350	14 NS		-110	1	-140
Net Imps 13

______________________________________________________________________

8 PETER CHAN & GREG SARGENT

Round 6

vs 18 PETER COLMER & SUSAN PHILLIPS

NS 5		2011 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS		-400	-8	-70	22 NS		-50	-1	-30
16 NS		-630	0	-640	23 NS		1440	0	1440
17 NS		-980	-11	-450	24 NS		90	2	40
18 NS		-450	0	-450	25 NS		400	0	410
19 NS		460	1	430	26 NS		-620	0	-610
20 NS		-100	-11	450	27 NS		100	4	-30
21 NS		670	12	70	28 NS		1440	12	760
Net Imps 0

______________________________________________________________________

8 PETER CHAN & GREG SARGENT

Round 7

vs 64 ANDY BABISZEWSKI & JUDY HOCKING

EW 5		2011 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 EW		50	-1	-80	8 EW		450	0	-450
2 EW		-150	-9	-270	9 EW		110	2	-40
3 EW		-420	-3	300	10 EW		100	4	40
4 EW		-600	-11	20	11 EW		-110	1	130
5 EW		90	1	-60	12 EW		-50	-5	-130
6 EW		-280	-5	80	13 EW		1370	12	-770
7 EW		1370	13	-560	14 EW		-170	-2	90
Net Imps -3

______________________________________________________________________

8 PETER CHAN & GREG SARGENT

Round 8

vs 20 JOHN KIKKERT & ANTHONY LUSK

NS 6		2011 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS		140	5	-50	22 NS		440	-1	460
16 NS		450	3	350	23 NS		-140	-5	50
17 NS		-170	5	-370	24 NS		-450	2	-520
18 NS		140	4	-10	25 NS		-120	-4	40
19 NS		420	6	200	26 NS		600	-1	640
20 NS		-620	-7	-350	27 NS		-140	-1	-120
21 NS		-110	6	-330	28 NS		650	1	630
Net Imps 13

______________________________________________________________________

8 PETER CHAN & GREG SARGENT

Round 9

vs 17 PAM MORGAN-KING & LEIGH THOMPSON

NS 5		2011 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 NS		100	1	80	8 NS		110	-2	190
2 NS		170	7	-120	9 NS		-100	-5	80
3 NS		-50	-2	20	10 NS		600	6	370
4 NS		-200	-1	-160	11 NS		-100	1	-120
5 NS		-130	-4	0	12 NS		140	3	50
6 NS		130	2	70	13 NS		-650	-1	-630
7 NS		140	0	140	14 NS		-100	-3	20
Net Imps 2

______________________________________________________________________

8 PETER CHAN & GREG SARGENT

Round 10

vs 14 DAVID BLACK & PHIL CHENEY

NS 5		2011 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS		-800	-8	-460	22 NS		-300	-4	-170
16 NS		140	5	-40	23 NS		-100	-2	-20
17 NS		120	3	30	24 NS		420	5	240
18 NS		200	-1	220	25 NS		450	2	370
19 NS		420	6	190	26 NS		150	5	-30
20 NS		150	-6	380	27 NS		-100	-14	930
21 NS		650	0	650	28 NS		-140	7	-450
Net Imps -2

______________________________________________________________________

8 PETER CHAN & GREG SARGENT

Round 11

vs 6 ATTILIO DE LUCA & DAVID LUSK

EW 6		2011 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
1 EW	2 N=	-90	-5	-100	8 EW	4 N-1	50	2	10
2 EW	5 xW-2	-300	4	450	9 EW	6 S+1	-1010	-6	750
3 EW	3NTS+2	-460	-2	400	10 EW	1NTxE=	180	3	-70
4 EW	5 N-1	100	3	-10	11 EW	4 S=	-420	0	420
5 EW	5 xN-2	500	5	-330	12 EW	7NTE-1	-50	-12	-600
6 EW	4 W-1	-100	-4	-30	13 EW	2 W+1	140	0	-150
7 EW	4 E+1	650	5	-450	14 EW	4 E-1	-50	-8	-300
Net Imps -15

______________________________________________________________________

8 PETER CHAN & GREG SARGENT

Round 12

vs 72 MICHAEL PAGE-HANIFY & ARTHUR PORTER

NS 9		2011 OPEN TRIALS QUALIFYING
BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG	BRD	CONTRACT	SCORE	IMPS	BUTLER AVG
15 NS	4 W-1	50	4	-110	22 NS	3NTS=	400	3	310
16 NS	5 W+1	-680	8	-1040	23 NS	3NTS+1	630	2	550
17 NS	3 E-1	50	0	50	24 NS	2 S+3	150	-2	210
18 NS	1 S+2	140	1	120	25 NS	6 W+1	-1460	-12	-800
19 NS	5 S=	400	4	240	26 NS	3 S=	140	2	90
20 NS	4 N+1	150	1	120	27 NS	3NTE-1	50	4	-110
21 NS	6 W+1	-940	2	-1000	28 NS	4 N-1	-100	-1	-70
Net Imps 16

______________________________________________________________________